tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3892857592788649371.post2239891032314462679..comments2021-09-04T09:34:11.521-07:00Comments on Signs and Shadows: Why be good?CatholicGuyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09129339825000536287noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3892857592788649371.post-91710539246466706182012-05-28T16:18:20.582-07:002012-05-28T16:18:20.582-07:00"The bigger problem is that often their outra..."The bigger problem is that often their outrage and their moral outlook is based not on something pricipled or true, but on the latest fashion of the day."<br /><br />Or that they don't realize that their priciples are simply the fashion of the day. What is "obviously right" was only so in the last decade.CatholicGuyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09129339825000536287noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3892857592788649371.post-56872490627855447742012-05-26T22:26:51.359-07:002012-05-26T22:26:51.359-07:00"What all of these responses illustrate thoug..."What all of these responses illustrate though is that there is a considerable lack of a coherent and consistent moral philosophy for the materialist atheist."<br />This is at least true for all the atheists I've come across. Ad Hominem attack is the best they can do in general. That or they call you stupid for being religous.<br /><br />As for Dawkins and crew, lol! You'll find no more rigid moralists than the new atheist crowd. Well, other idiologists can get they way as well. The bigger problem is that often their outrage and their moral outlook is based not on something pricipled or true, but on the latest fashion of the day.Theodosiusnoreply@blogger.com